← Back to catalogue
Published

Court / Arbitration Case

vr.wm-pol-009 · wm-pol-009-court-arbitration-case

Represent a governed court, tribunal or arbitration proceeding with authoritative docket identity, procedural history and child legal records independent of storage and interface format.

World Models Society, people and institutions SOC.POL.CSE

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 12 layers · 24 findings · 72 questions

Case identity, forum and procedure profile Identifies one proceeding in its authoritative docket and pins the forum, jurisdiction and applicable procedure.

Docket identity, class and master register

Stable case identity and jurisdiction-qualified classification.

Case identifier, docket register, alias and consolidation

Master case identifier, namespace, docket, aliases, joined or severed case links, resolver, version and collision state.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define case identifier, docket register, alias and consolidation for this case? identity
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports case identifier, docket register, alias and consolidation? evidence
  3. How may case identifier, docket register, alias and consolidation be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Court, tribunal, arbitration, stage, track and procedure class

Forum-kind profile, matter class, instance, track, expedited status, procedure rules and classification versions.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define court, tribunal, arbitration, stage, track and procedure class for this case? classification
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports court, tribunal, arbitration, stage, track and procedure class? evidence
  3. How may court, tribunal, arbitration, stage, track and procedure class be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Forum assignment, jurisdiction, seat and competence

References the deciding body and the asserted basis for competence.

Forum organization, chamber, panel, judge, arbitrator and clerk reference

External organization and person references, procedural roles, appointment, assignment, recusal and valid intervals.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define forum organization, chamber, panel, judge, arbitrator and clerk reference for this case? relationship
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports forum organization, chamber, panel, judge, arbitrator and clerk reference? evidence
  3. How may forum organization, chamber, panel, judge, arbitrator and clerk reference be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Subject, personal and territorial jurisdiction, seat, venue and referral basis

Jurisdiction assertions, arbitration agreement or referral, seat, venue, competence decision, challenge and applicable procedure.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define subject, personal and territorial jurisdiction, seat, venue and referral basis for this case? authority
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports subject, personal and territorial jurisdiction, seat, venue and referral basis? evidence
  3. How may subject, personal and territorial jurisdiction, seat, venue and referral basis be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation
Dispute, claims, parties and representation Defines what is contested and records procedural roles without importing party, contract, offense or claim masters.

Dispute, claim, counterclaim, defense and issues

References asserted causes, relief and contested questions.

Underlying dispute, contract, offense, event and subject reference

External matter identifiers, relationship to the case, jurisdiction, factual scope, value and non-inference boundaries.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define underlying dispute, contract, offense, event and subject reference for this case? relationship
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports underlying dispute, contract, offense, event and subject reference? evidence
  3. How may underlying dispute, contract, offense, event and subject reference be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Claim, counterclaim, defense, issue, relief and controversy state

Claim reference, proponent, respondent, legal and factual basis, requested relief, amount, status, disposition and dependencies.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define claim, counterclaim, defense, issue, relief and controversy state for this case? definition
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports claim, counterclaim, defense, issue, relief and controversy state? evidence
  3. How may claim, counterclaim, defense, issue, relief and controversy state be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Party role, standing, capacity and representation

Records case-specific participation and authority.

Claimant, respondent, appellant, intervenor, witness and other role

External party reference, procedural role, side, capacity, standing assertion, confidentiality class and interval.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define claimant, respondent, appellant, intervenor, witness and other role for this case? relationship
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports claimant, respondent, appellant, intervenor, witness and other role? evidence
  3. How may claimant, respondent, appellant, intervenor, witness and other role be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Representative, counsel, mandate, legal aid, notice and conflict

External representative, engagement or authority reference, scope, service address, legal aid, conflicts and termination.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define representative, counsel, mandate, legal aid, notice and conflict for this case? authority
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports representative, counsel, mandate, legal aid, notice and conflict? evidence
  3. How may representative, counsel, mandate, legal aid, notice and conflict be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation
Docket, filings, service, schedule and hearings Orders procedural events and composes child filings while preserving cross-border service and deadline evidence.

Docket events, filings, motions and service

Maintains append-only procedural history and child-record membership.

Filing, pleading, motion, notice, order and child membership

WM-POL-019 child identifiers, filing kind, submitter role, target issue, receipt, acceptance, seal, confidentiality and supersession.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define filing, pleading, motion, notice, order and child membership for this case? composition
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports filing, pleading, motion, notice, order and child membership? evidence
  3. How may filing, pleading, motion, notice, order and child membership be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Service method, recipient, address, certificate, effective time and contest

Transmission channel, serving authority, recipient, address, delivery evidence, legal-effect rule, failure and challenge.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define service method, recipient, address, certificate, effective time and contest for this case? evidence
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports service method, recipient, address, certificate, effective time and contest? evidence
  3. How may service method, recipient, address, certificate, effective time and contest be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Deadlines, calendar, hearings and participation

Represents scheduled and actual procedural time with attendance and accessibility.

Deadline, trigger, calculation, extension, stay, default and compliance

Rule source, trigger event, computed due time, calendar, timezone, extension, stay, filing event, lateness and excusal.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define deadline, trigger, calculation, extension, stay, default and compliance for this case? temporal
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports deadline, trigger, calculation, extension, stay, default and compliance? evidence
  3. How may deadline, trigger, calculation, extension, stay, default and compliance be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Hearing, session, location, mode, participants, record and outcome

Scheduled and actual times, physical or remote venue, panel, attendance, interpretation, accessibility, transcript and procedural outcome.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define hearing, session, location, mode, participants, record and outcome for this case? event
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports hearing, session, location, mode, participants, record and outcome? evidence
  3. How may hearing, session, location, mode, participants, record and outcome be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation
Evidence, findings, orders and procedural safeguards Composes evidence-item references and records admission, weighing and procedural control without duplicating evidence or decision content.

Evidence record, admission, custody and findings

Links child evidence items to case-specific rulings and uses.

Evidence item, exhibit, submission, custody and child membership

WM-POL-020 child identifier, proponent, issue, submission event, custody reference, confidentiality, version and disposition.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define evidence item, exhibit, submission, custody and child membership for this case? composition
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports evidence item, exhibit, submission, custody and child membership? evidence
  3. How may evidence item, exhibit, submission, custody and child membership be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Admission, exclusion, weight, credibility, finding and burden

Decision maker, rule, hearing context, ruling, weight, credibility, standard or burden, fact finding, reasons and challenge.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define admission, exclusion, weight, credibility, finding and burden for this case? decision
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports admission, exclusion, weight, credibility, finding and burden? evidence
  3. How may admission, exclusion, weight, credibility, finding and burden be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Interim and procedural orders, fairness and participation

Records case-management control and safeguard assertions.

Interim measure, procedural order, injunction, security and cost order

Order reference, authority, affected parties, terms, issue and expiry time, reasons, security, challenge and compliance reference.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define interim measure, procedural order, injunction, security and cost order for this case? decision
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports interim measure, procedural order, injunction, security and cost order? evidence
  3. How may interim measure, procedural order, injunction, security and cost order be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Notice, opportunity to be heard, equality, impartiality, recusal and accommodation

Safeguard profile, party, required opportunity, actual event, panel conflict, recusal, accessibility response and contest.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define notice, opportunity to be heard, equality, impartiality, recusal and accommodation for this case? validation
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports notice, opportunity to be heard, equality, impartiality, recusal and accommodation? evidence
  3. How may notice, opportunity to be heard, equality, impartiality, recusal and accommodation be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation
Decisions, remedies, review, recognition and closure Composes judgment children and links remedy, review and enforcement processes while keeping their masters separate.

Judgment, award, reasons, remedies and finality

Records child decision membership and outcome metadata.

Judgment, award, order, reasons, dissent and child membership

WM-POL-021 child identifier, decision kind, deciding composition, outcome, reasons, opinions, issue and publication references.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define judgment, award, order, reasons, dissent and child membership for this case? composition
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports judgment, award, order, reasons, dissent and child membership? evidence
  3. How may judgment, award, order, reasons, dissent and child membership be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Remedy, cost, interest, performance, declaration and finality state

External remedy references, addressee, terms, amount, currency, interest, finality assertion, operative scope and correction status.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define remedy, cost, interest, performance, declaration and finality state for this case? state
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports remedy, cost, interest, performance, declaration and finality state? evidence
  3. How may remedy, cost, interest, performance, declaration and finality state be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Appeal, set-aside, recognition, enforcement and retention

Links successor proceedings and external execution without treating them as state flags.

Appeal, review, rehearing, set-aside, correction and successor case

Challenged decision, route, forum, grounds, deadline, successor case, stay, outcome and effect on finality.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define appeal, review, rehearing, set-aside, correction and successor case for this case? lifecycle
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports appeal, review, rehearing, set-aside, correction and successor case? evidence
  3. How may appeal, review, rehearing, set-aside, correction and successor case be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Recognition, enforcement, satisfaction, closure, archive and legal hold

External recognition or enforcement case, jurisdiction, refusal ground, satisfaction reference, closure basis, retention and hold.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define recognition, enforcement, satisfaction, closure, archive and legal hold for this case? retention
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports recognition, enforcement, satisfaction, closure, archive and legal hold? evidence
  3. How may recognition, enforcement, satisfaction, closure, archive and legal hold be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation
Publication, interoperability and agent governance Provides purpose-bound views, judicial-document projections and safe automated case maintenance.

Access, confidentiality, publication and statistics

Controls party, forum, public and analytical projections.

Party, forum, public, confidential, sealed and redacted view

Audience, purpose, authority, field policy, pseudonymization, sealed scope, reasons access, expiry and re-identification risk.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define party, forum, public, confidential, sealed and redacted view for this case? access
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports party, forum, public, confidential, sealed and redacted view? evidence
  3. How may party, forum, public, confidential, sealed and redacted view be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Caseload, duration, outcome, publication and bias statistics

Dataset, cohort, case stage, measures, denominator, suppression, method, uncertainty and prohibited individual inference.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define caseload, duration, outcome, publication and bias statistics for this case? measurement
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports caseload, duration, outcome, publication and bias statistics? evidence
  3. How may caseload, duration, outcome, publication and bias statistics be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Akoma, ECLI, provenance and safe agent operations

Maps case and decision metadata and controls autonomous actions.

Akoma Ntoso, ECLI, LegalRuleML and PROV projection

Source and target versions, case and decision mapping, authority, transformed fields, omissions and round-trip limits.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define akoma ntoso, ecli, legalruleml and prov projection for this case? interoperability
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports akoma ntoso, ecli, legalruleml and prov projection? evidence
  3. How may akoma ntoso, ecli, legalruleml and prov projection be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Agent operation, authority, pre-write, post-write, concurrency and recovery

Operation class, actor, authority, preconditions, expected effects, stale-head check, validation, rollback and audit evidence.

  1. What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define agent operation, authority, pre-write, post-write, concurrency and recovery for this case? security
  2. Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports agent operation, authority, pre-write, post-write, concurrency and recovery? evidence
  3. How may agent operation, authority, pre-write, post-write, concurrency and recovery be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history? validation

Classifiers Filled

Family
World Models
Category
Society, people and institutions
Entry kind
aggregate
Navigation path
NAV.SOC.POL.CSE
Domain
SOC.POL.CSE
Industry
Cross-industry
Tags
courtarbitrationcasesoc.pol.cse
Also called
A19

What it is Filled

Owns case identity, forum assignment, jurisdiction basis, dispute and claim references, procedural-party roles, docket events, schedules, hearings, procedural rulings, child filing, evidence and decision membership, remedy and review references, access views and closure. Forum, party, claim, filing content, evidence lifecycle, judgment content, remedy performance, appeal and enforcement masters remain external or child models.

In scope

  • Docket identity, court or arbitration profile, forum assignment, jurisdiction, seat, parties, claims and procedural roles
  • Docket events, service, deadlines, hearings, evidence-use rulings, procedural orders and safeguards
  • Judgment-child links, remedies, finality, review and enforcement references, access, retention, interoperability and safe operations

Out of scope

  • Forum organization, party identity, lawyer engagement, underlying contract, offense, asset or event masters
  • WM-POL-019 filing content, WM-POL-020 evidence lifecycle, WM-POL-021 judgment content, remedy execution and enforcement case masters
  • Automated adjudication, legal advice, outcome prediction or universal procedural law

Why it exists Filled

Represent a governed court, tribunal or arbitration proceeding with authoritative docket identity, procedural history and child legal records independent of storage and interface format.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Models the procedural container of a dispute in one forum, not the dispute, claim or underlying event.
  • Keeps filings, evidence and judgments as child records with their own identity.
  • Separates allegations, findings, orders and enforceable judgments as distinct states.
  • Links appeals, recognition and enforcement as separate cases rather than extending this one.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Issue or draft as final any order, finding, judgment or award.
  • Disclose sealed, confidential or anonymised material to unauthorised parties.
  • Treat an allegation or admitted exhibit as an established fact.
  • Change the docket record after the fact without a correction entry.
  • Communicate with one party about the merits outside the forum procedure.

Only with a human decision

  • Any adjudicative or adverse procedural decision.
  • Unsealing, anonymisation choices and publication of case material.
  • Declaring finality, closure or reopening of a case.

May

  • Docket filings and compute procedural deadlines from forum rules for checking.
  • Schedule hearings and send service notices on instruction of the registry.
  • Prepare a case chronology or index of filings for the tribunal.
  • Check filings for format and completeness against forum rules.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Due process, equality of arms and the right to be heard must not be weakened by automation.
  • Case records expose parties, witnesses and minors to stigma; disclosure must follow anonymisation rules.
  • Missed deadlines computed wrongly can cost a party its claim or defence.

Who is affected

  • Parties and their counsel
  • Witnesses, victims and minors named in the case
  • Judges, arbitrators and registry staff

Owners Filled

Steward

Dimension identity, owner, court or arbitration case authority, records authority and namespace

Roles

Forum records authority
Own canonical case identity, docket integrity and official procedural state.
Judge, tribunal or arbitral panel
Issue findings, orders and decisions within established competence.
Clerk or case administrator
Docket submissions, manage schedules, service records and procedural notices.
Party or representative
Submit filings, answer evidence and exercise procedural access and challenge rights.
Evidence custodian
Maintain external evidence identity, custody and integrity.
Publication and access steward
Apply public, sealed, confidential, redaction and statistical-view policy.
Records and retention steward
Apply archive, legal hold, disposition and recovery policy.

Links to other meta-models Filled

child

  • WM-POL-019 Legal Filing / Pleading - Compose filings and pleadings into the docket while preserving their identity and lifecycle.
  • WM-POL-020 Evidence Item / Exhibit - Compose evidence references and case-specific admission or use without taking custody ownership.
  • WM-POL-021 Judgment / Legal Decision - Compose judgments, awards and decisions while keeping content, opinions and corrections independently governed.

references

  • Forum, Person, Organization, Claim, Remedy, Review and Enforcement models - Resolve external actors, underlying matters, ordered consequences and post-decision processes.

aligned

  • Akoma Ntoso, ECLI, LegalRuleML and PROV-O - Project judicial documents, case-law identity, legal assertions and provenance with declared loss.

neighbor

  • Court, Tribunal or Arbitral Institution - The forum is an external organization with competence; the case is one proceeding in its docket or administration.
  • Legal Filing / Pleading - WM-POL-019 owns each procedural submission; the case composes its identifier, role, receipt and docket relation.
  • Evidence Item / Exhibit - WM-POL-020 owns evidence identity, custody and integrity; the case records submission, admission, exclusion, weight and use.
  • Judgment / Legal Decision - WM-POL-021 owns decision text and identity; the case records membership, outcome, finality and review links.
  • Enforcement and Remedy - A case may order or reference remedies, but recognition, enforcement, performance and satisfaction have separate authority and lifecycles.

contains

  • WM-POL-019
  • WM-POL-020
  • WM-POL-021

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Authoritative master-system docket or case-management identifier qualified by forum and jurisdiction.
  • Governed globally resolvable case IRI with authoritative docket binding.
  • Dimension UUID or ULID when no external identifier exists.

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Filled

  • A case has a forum, a case number, parties in procedural roles and a docket of dated events.
  • It is confused with the underlying dispute, a single filing, a judgment or an enforcement case.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Open case: Create docket identity, profile, forum assignment, jurisdiction basis and initial parties and claims.
  • Assign panel and procedural roles: Bind judges, arbitrators, clerk, parties and representatives with authority and conflict checks.
  • Docket filing and service: Attach a WM-POL-019 child, record receipt, acceptance and legally relevant service assertion.
  • Schedule deadline or hearing: Create a rule-grounded deadline, session or hearing with timezone, participants and accessibility needs.
  • Attach evidence and record ruling: Compose a WM-POL-020 child and record admission, exclusion, weight or custody references.
  • Issue procedural or interim order: Record authority, terms, reasons, affected parties, effect interval and challenge route.
  • Register judgment or award child: Compose WM-POL-021 and record outcome, finality, remedy references, publication and opinions.
  • Link review, recognition or enforcement case: Connect appeal, set-aside, recognition or enforcement successors and effects on finality.
  • Issue purpose-bound case view: Create party, forum, public, confidential, statistical or interoperability projection.
  • Close, archive or reopen case: Record closure basis, archive, legal hold or authorized reopening while preserving all cited history.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Wrong deadline computation leading to default or forfeiture.
  • Leak of sealed evidence or witness identity.
  • Misattribution of a filing to the wrong case or party.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • ECLI European Case Law Identifier.
  • OASIS LegalXML Electronic Court Filing.
  • Akoma Ntoso for judgments and orders.
  • e-CODEX for cross-border judicial exchange in the EU.

Context of use required Filled

  • ECLI is a European judicial-decision identifier and does not identify every case or define universal procedure.
  • UNCITRAL instruments concern arbitration and depend on agreement and applicable national law.
  • HCCH conventions govern specific cross-border service or judgment contexts and do not define domestic case lifecycle.

Sources Filled

  1. Akoma Ntoso Version 1.0, Part 1: XML Vocabulary - OASIS
  2. LegalRuleML Core Specification Version 1.0 - OASIS
  3. Council Conclusions on the European Case Law Identifier and minimum uniform metadata - Council of the European Union
  4. UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules - United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
  5. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration - United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
  6. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters - Hague Conference on Private International Law
  7. Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents - Hague Conference on Private International Law
  8. PROV-O: The PROV Ontology - World Wide Web Consortium
  9. Time Ontology in OWL - World Wide Web Consortium
  10. Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps - Internet Engineering Task Force

Open questions

  • Approve composition cardinalities and ownership contracts for filings, evidence items and judgments.
  • Develop court, tribunal, arbitration, appellate, criminal, civil and cross-border procedure profiles.
  • Create fixtures for joinder, severance, transfer, failed service, sealed records, recusal, interim measures, partial awards, appeal, set-aside and reopening.
  • Validate certified judicial-document and case-law projections with authority, time, access, information-loss and round-trip tests.
  • No independent Claude or Grok result was available; later judicial-administration and arbitration review is required before canonical promotion.
  • Jurisdiction-specific civil, criminal, administrative, constitutional, family, insolvency, appellate and arbitral procedure profiles require specialist review.
  • Approved candidate CONTAINS relations identify child models but cardinalities and lifecycle contracts still require governance review.
  • Certified Akoma Ntoso, ECLI, LegalRuleML and court-system crosswalks and conformance fixtures remain future work.

Machine files

Provenance

world-models research · reviewable-draft

Built from: models/wm-pol-009-court-arbitration-case/spec.yaml, ver-cy/world-models/card-supplements/wm-pol-009-court-arbitration-case.json