EM-LEG-05 · Subject model · W3
Legal case and dispute
Case, parties to the proceedings, claims, events and decisions. Contract, evidence and financial reserve remain references.
Partially published; research continues
Claude: complete-initial-study-plus-single-frozen-audit-remediated; Grok: complete-reconciled-visible-response-hidden-coordination-and-sources-excluded.
Published results
Research note, in Russian: Canonical/runtime promotion remains governed by the package allocation, identity and dependency holds.
Subject boundary and candidate types
- LegalCase
- Claim
- ProceedingEvent
- CaseOutcome
Deep research questions
- How to separate a party's assertion from an established fact?
- How to link several proceedings of one dispute?
- How to model an appeal?
Verifiable invariants
- An assertion has an author and a proof status
- A decision is tied to a body and a date
- An appeal does not erase the previous decision
End-to-end acceptance scenario
A dispute with a counterclaim and an overturned decision preserves the sequence of facts and access restrictions.
Negative case
A claimed amount is recorded as confirmed debt.
Approaches to compare
- OASIS UBL/FIBO: agreements, parties and obligations
- ODRL: permission, prohibition, duty and constraint
- Primary legal sources of selected jurisdictions; subject-matter verification of applicability is mandatory
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-POL-009 · Court / Arbitration Case · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.