EM-LND-02 · Landscape · W2
Group-of-companies landscape
An overview of the group's business perimeters, legal entities, control and mandates without moving it into a mandatory Universe.
Partially published; research continues
Claude: complete-frozen-study-and-audit; Grok: complete-browser-study.
Published results
Research note, in Russian: Canonical promotion remains held by the limits published with the profile.
Subject boundary and candidate types
- GroupLandscape
- GroupScopeView
Deep research questions
- Which group boundaries differ by purpose?
- How are unknown owners visible?
- How is access separated for subsidiary organizations?
Verifiable invariants
- Control and brand are shown separately
- An unknown link is not a null link
- Federation preserves the owners of facts
End-to-end acceptance scenario
A holding and a franchise network have different perimeter views and restricted cross-organizational projections.
Negative case
A shared brand allows reading all data of subsidiary companies.
Approaches to compare
- Vercy composition and whole-object: a separate landscape object and delegation
- ArchiMate/ISO 42010: views, questions and representation rules
- Compare participants' domain models and the practical assembly of the permitted context
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-ORG-001 · Organization · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-ORG-012 · Inter-organizational Relationship · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.