EM-LND-09 · Landscape · W2
Landscape of contracts and obligations
A map of parties, agreements, obligations, deadlines and fulfillment dependencies.
Partially published; research continues
Claude: complete-frozen-study-and-audit; Grok: complete-browser-study.
Published results
Research note, in Russian: Canonical promotion remains held by the limits published with the profile.
Subject boundary and candidate types
- ContractLandscape
- ObligationNetwork
Deep research questions
- Which obligations survive contract termination?
- Where does a condition depend on someone else's performance?
- Which agreements conflict?
Verifiable invariants
- The contract term is not the term of each obligation
- Parties are historical
- A dispute is visible separately from a delinquency
End-to-end acceptance scenario
Contract expiry preserves active post-contractual obligations and their links to evidence.
Negative case
An expired contract deletes the confidentiality obligation.
Approaches to compare
- Vercy composition and whole-object: a separate landscape object and delegation
- ArchiMate/ISO 42010: views, questions and representation rules
- Compare participant subject models and the practical assembly of a permitted context
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-ECO-006 · Commercial Contract · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-XCT-029 · Obligation / Commitment · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.