EM-PEO-03 · Subject model · W3
Competencies and Qualifications
Skill definition, proficiency scale, assessment, qualification credential and validity period. The professional role uses these definitions.
Partially published; research continues
Claude: complete-frozen-study-and-single-audit-remediated; Grok: complete-reconciled.
Published results
Research note, in Russian: Canonical/runtime promotion remains governed by the package allocation, identity and dependency holds.
Subject boundary and candidate types
- Competency
- Skill
- ProficiencyScale
- CompetencyAssessment
- Qualification
- Credential
Deep research questions
- How do ESCO, SFIA and local scales relate?
- How does a self-assessment differ from a verified credential?
- How does comparability change when a scale is updated?
Verifiable invariants
- A skill definition is not possession of the skill
- An assessment specifies the scale, method and date
- Certificate expiry does not erase the fact of its issuance
End-to-end acceptance scenario
One competency is assessed by different methods and scales; the mapping shows the losses and does not invent an exact level translation.
Negative case
A completed course automatically means expert level.
Approaches to compare
- HR Open: exchange of HR data
- W3C ORG and ESCO/SFIA: relationships, skills and levels of responsibility
- HRIS/ATS/LMS practice and independent verification of outcome measurement via SPACE
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-PER-009 · Skill / Competency · 0.2.0-legacy · not installed automatically
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-PER-008 · Education / Qualification · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.