← Back to catalogue
Research draft

female genital mutilation

vr.tr.female-genital-mutilation · ACT.ACT

Let an agent explain female genital mutilation factually and respectfully, relay WHO classification, health consequences, prevalence, law and prevention from WHO, UNICEF and legal sources, route any girl or woman at risk to police, child protection services and FGM helplines, support survivors to specialist clinics without judgement, and never provide procedural detail or facilitation.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain female genital mutilation factually and respectfully, relay WHO classification, health consequences, prevalence, law and prevention from WHO, UNICEF and legal sources, route any girl or woman at risk to police, child protection services and FGM helplines, support survivors to specialist clinics without judgement, and never provide procedural detail or facilitation.

All procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons, classified by WHO into Type 1 clitoridectomy, Type 2 excision, Type 3 infibulation and Type 4 other harmful procedures, practised in parts of Africa, the Middle East and Asia and in diaspora communities, with WHO and UNICEF estimating over 230 million women and girls alive having undergone it; it causes serious short and long-term harm, is recognised internationally as a human rights violation, and is illegal in many countries including the United Kingdom and the Gambia. The registry alias clitoral hood reduction usually denotes a cosmetic surgical procedure whose classification is debated.

What it is for: Not applicable; a harmful practice and human rights violation.

It can be explain classification and harms; relay law and prevention; route people at risk to protection services; point survivors to specialist care.

Distinguishing features

No health benefit

Serious harms

Human rights violation

Illegal in many countries

What it looks like

Not a visible object; a harmful practice.

Physical character

women and girls affected: over 230 million people - WHO and UNICEF 2024 estimate

International Day of Zero Tolerance: February 6 date

UK Female Genital Mutilation Act: 2003 year

Gambia ban: 2015 year - upheld in 2024 after a repeal attempt

How it is recognised

Non-medical injury or removal of female genitalia

Clitoridectomy, clitoris excision, infibulation, FGM in the Gambia, FGM in the UK, clitoral hood reduction

Consensual adult cosmetic genital surgery is regulated separately and debated; intersex surgeries raise distinct issues; male circumcision is a separate topic

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

harmful cultural practice

is addressed by - classification and guidance

World Health Organization

violates -

human rights

is contrasted with - cosmetic surgery, debated classification

labiaplasty

In practice

Families and kinds

Type 1 clitoridectomy

Type 2 excision

Type 3 infibulation

Type 4 other harmful procedures

national legal and prevalence contexts

Standards and regulation

WHO guidelines on management of complications

UN General Assembly resolutions on FGM

National laws such as the UK FGM Act 2003 and the Gambia Women s Amendment Act 2015

Maputo Protocol

Failure modes and hazards

Procedural detail or facilitation, which is out of scope

Stigmatising survivors or whole communities

Missing a girl at imminent risk

Also called

female genital mutilation in the Gambiaclitoris excisioninfibulationclitoridectomyclitoral hood reductionFemale genital mutilation in the UKfemale genital mutilation in the United Statesfemale genital cutting in Sierra Leonefemale genital mutilation in New Zealandfemale genital mutilation in Nigeriafemale genital mutilation in Indiafemale genital mutilation in Indonesiafemale genital mutilation in Malaysiareinfibulation

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What FGM is.

Attribution.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is female genital mutilation, and how do the WHO types differ? definition
  2. Is a girl or woman at risk now, in which case contact police, child protection or an FGM helpline immediately? boundary

Terms

Named terms and contexts.

Terms

Terms.

  1. What do clitoridectomy, excision and infibulation mean, how is FGM addressed in the Gambia and UK, and why is clitoral hood reduction debated? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific context? action
Health Health consequences.

Attribution.

Harms

Harms.

Harms

Harms.

  1. What short and long-term health harms does WHO describe? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Care

Survivor care.

Care

Care.

  1. What specialist care, including deinfibulation and psychological support, is available to survivors? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Law Law and prevention.

Regulation.

Laws

Laws.

Laws

Laws.

  1. How do national laws prohibit FGM, including protection orders and mandatory reporting in the UK? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003? action

Prevention

Prevention.

Prevention

Prevention.

  1. What community-led prevention approaches do UNICEF and survivor advocates describe? provenance
  2. Which entry fits UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on FGM? action
Context Prevalence and advocacy.

Context.

Prevalence

Prevalence.

Prevalence

Prevalence.

  1. How is prevalence measured, and how is it changing, checked against current sources? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Demographic and Health Surveys? action

Advocacy

Survivor advocacy.

Advocacy

Advocacy.

  1. Which survivor-led organisations campaign against FGM? provenance
  2. Which entry fits International Day of Zero Tolerance for FGM? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should national contexts be separate entries?
  • How should WHO and UNICEF data be linked and kept current?
  • How should the classification of cosmetic procedures such as clitoral hood reduction be recorded?