scientific method
Let an agent explain the scientific method by steps, variants, evidence quality and limits, and help evaluate claims.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled
4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions
Steps How it works.
Hypothesis
Testable claim.
Hypothesis
Hypothesis.
- Is the hypothesis testable and falsifiable? boundary
- What prediction follows? definition
Test
Experiment or observation.
Test
Testing.
- How is the prediction tested, with which controls? definition
- How large is the sample? measurement
Quality Evidence strength.
Design
Controls and blinding.
Design
Study design.
- Does the design control for bias, for example with randomisation or blinding? boundary
- Was it preregistered? provenance
Replication
Confirmation.
Replication
Replication.
- Has the result been replicated independently? provenance
- Is there a systematic review? provenance
Evaluation Claims.
Claims
Science or not.
Claims
Evaluating claims.
- Is a claim based on scientific method or on anecdote? boundary
- What evidence supports it? provenance
Uncertainty
Limits.
Uncertainty
Uncertainty.
- What are the limits and uncertainties? boundary
- Are they reported? provenance
Teaching Learning.
Fair test
Activities.
Fair test
Fair tests.
- How can a fair test be designed at school? action
- Which variables are controlled? definition
Variants
Across fields.
Variants
Field variants.
- How does the method differ across fields? definition
- Is there one scientific method? boundary
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Thing Registry
- Category
- Information and virtual systems
- Entry kind
- thing
- Plane
- INF
- Domain
- INF.KNW
- Other names and narrower kinds
- sham comparator, Celsius temperature scale, research tool, health impact assessment, microscopic technique, hypothetico-deductive model, sequence analysis, medical method, materials testing, social science methodology, randomized experiment, diatom analysis
What it is Filled
A systematic approach to building knowledge through observation, forming hypotheses, making predictions, testing them by experiment or observation, and revising theories, with controls, replication and peer review.
Why it exists Filled
Let an agent explain the scientific method by steps, variants, evidence quality and limits, and help evaluate claims.
Distinguishing features Filled
- Testable claims
- Controls and replication
- Open to revision
- Not a single fixed recipe
What robots and AI may and may not do Filled
Must not
- Fabricate, falsify or selectively report data.
- Present a hypothesis or preliminary result as established fact.
- Claim scientific backing for a statement that lacks evidence.
- Run experiments on people or animals without ethical approval and consent.
Only with a human decision
- Approving research involving human participants or animals.
- Retracting or correcting published work.
May
- Explain the scientific method and how it builds and corrects knowledge.
- Help researchers design, document and check analyses.
Moral aspects Filled
- Science depends on honesty; misconduct harms everyone who relies on the results.
- Research subjects must be protected by consent and ethical review.
Who is affected
- Research participants and animals
- The public
- Other scientists
Owners Filled
Steward
Nobody owns it; scientific communities, journals and research ethics bodies uphold its norms.
Links to other meta-models Filled
parent
- Q133798571 - registry parent class
- Q17079481 - registry parent class
related
- scholarly method - category
- science - practice
- evidence - output
- inference - reasoning
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled
Identity and identifiers required Filled
- Vercy registry: vr.tr.scientific-method
- Wikidata: Q46857 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q46857)
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
Plane INF: no invented physical properties.
Recognition optional Filled
- Hypothesis, prediction, test, conclusion
- Controls and blinding such as sham comparators
- Methods vary by field
- Hypotheses, experiments, data, analyses and publications.
Capabilities and actions required Filled
- design a fair test
- evaluate study quality
- distinguish science from pseudoscience
- teach scientific thinking
Hazards and failure modes required Filled
- Confirmation bias
- p-hacking and selective reporting
- Overclaiming from single studies
Standards and interfaces required Filled
- Research integrity codes
- Reporting guidelines such as CONSORT and PRISMA
- Research ethics review
Context of use required Filled
- Producing reliable, testable knowledge.
- hypothetico-deductive method
- experimental method with controls
- observational and field methods
- computational and modelling methods
- meta-analysis and systematic review
Sources Filled
- Wikidata item Q46857: scientific method - identity and sense of the item
- Wikipedia: Scientific method - general description of the item
Open questions
- Should method variants be separate entries?
- How should reporting guidelines be linked?
- How should field differences be recorded?
Machine files
Provenance
thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed
Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q46857/spec.json