logic
Let an agent explain logic by branch, help people construct and evaluate arguments, apply formal methods and find learning resources.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent explain logic by branch, help people construct and evaluate arguments, apply formal methods and find learning resources.
The systematic study of valid reasoning, inference and argument, including formal logic such as propositional and predicate logic, mathematical logic, computability and complexity theory, informal logic and fallacies, and historical traditions such as Aristotelian, Indian and Buddhist logic; logic underpins mathematics, computer science and law.
What it is for: Reasoning, mathematics, computing and argumentation.
It can be evaluate an argument for validity and soundness; explain formal logic systems; identify fallacies; apply logic in computing and law.
Distinguishing features
Studies valid inference
Formal and informal branches
Foundational for mathematics
Many historical traditions
What it looks like
Not physical; symbols, proofs, truth tables and arguments.
How it is recognised
Symbols such as connectives and quantifiers
Proofs and truth tables
Rhetoric persuades, logic validates
Related models
is a kind of - category
underpins - field
is applied in - application
is related to - proved statements
In practice
Families and kinds
propositional and predicate logic
mathematical logic and set theory
computability and complexity theory
informal logic and critical thinking
non-classical logics such as modal and fuzzy logic
Standards and regulation
No specific regulation; standards exist for logical notation
Failure modes and hazards
Confusing validity with truth
Formalising natural language poorly
Also called
+21
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Also registered as vr.tr.logic
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Arguments Evaluating reasoning.
Validity and soundness differ.
Validity
Valid arguments.
Validity
Validity.
- Is this argument valid, and are its premises true? boundary
- What is its logical form? definition
Fallacies
Errors.
Fallacies
Fallacies.
- Does the argument contain a fallacy, and which one? boundary
- How can it be repaired? action
Formal Formal systems.
Systems have rules.
Systems
Logics.
Systems
Formal systems.
- How do propositional and predicate logic differ? definition
- Which proof system is used? definition
Metatheory
Completeness and limits.
Metatheory
Metatheory.
- What do completeness and incompleteness theorems say? definition
- Who proved them? provenance
Computing Logic in computer science.
Logic runs computers.
Computability
What can be computed.
Computability
Computability.
- What does computability theory say about this problem? definition
- Is it decidable? boundary
Complexity
Complexity classes.
Complexity
Complexity.
- Which complexity class does this problem belong to? definition
- What is known about P versus NP? provenance
Traditions History and learning.
Logic has many histories.
History
Traditions.
History
Historical traditions.
- How do Aristotelian, Indian and Buddhist logical traditions differ, according to scholars? provenance
- Which texts are key? provenance
Learn
Learning logic.
Learn
Learning.
- Which resources suit a beginner in logic? action
- Which exercises help? action
What the second pass must settle
- Should branches be separate entries?
- How should textbooks be linked?
- How should historical traditions be linked?