EM-LND-03 · Landscape · W2
Workforce landscape
Composition of people, relationships, qualifications, assignments and availability within a permitted management context.
Partially published; research continues
Claude: complete-frozen-study-and-audit; Grok: complete-browser-study.
Published results
Research note, in Russian: Base composition approval; normative FTE/headcount crosswalks; canonical source fixtures; disclosure-policy validation.
Subject boundary and candidate types
- WorkforceLandscape
- WorkforceScope
Deep research questions
- How to distinguish legal headcount, unique persons and FTE?
- How to show contractors and dual affiliation?
- Which aggregates expose individual-level data?
Verifiable invariants
- Perimeter and counting method are explicit
- Relationships do not replace Person
- Small groups are checked by a disclosure policy
End-to-end acceptance scenario
One person with two employers yields 1 unique person and methodologically grounded headcount/FTE.
Negative case
A person with two contracts is automatically counted as two people.
Approaches to compare
- Vercy composition and whole-object: a separate landscape object and delegation
- ArchiMate/ISO 42010: views, questions and representation rules
- Compare participant subject models and the practical assembly of a permitted context
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-ORG-005 · Employment · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-ORG-016 · Work Assignment · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.