EM-PEO-05 · Subject model · W3
Learning, Development and Succession
Training programs and participation, development plans, career paths and succession plans. The fact of training and a qualification are distinct.
Queued for research
Claude: not-started; Grok: not-started.
Research note, in Russian: Entire research brief pending
Subject boundary and candidate types
- LearningProgram
- Enrollment
- LearningResult
- DevelopmentPlan
- CareerPath
- SuccessionPlan
Deep research questions
- What confirms a learning outcome beyond attendance?
- How is a desired career separated from a managerial replacement plan?
- How is disclosure of successor readiness assessments restricted?
Verifiable invariants
- A plan is not an HR decision
- An outcome references a version of the learning objective
- Succession does not automatically grant access to the position
End-to-end acceptance scenario
One course closes different development objectives; revising the succession plan does not change current assignments.
Negative case
The status "ready successor" is interpreted as an appointment to the post.
Approaches to compare
- HR Open: exchange of HR data
- W3C ORG and ESCO/SFIA: relationships, skills and levels of responsibility
- HRIS/ATS/LMS practice and independent verification of outcome measurement via SPACE
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-ACT-038 · Learning Activity / Course Delivery · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.